Skip to main content

LOCAL PLACE. BIG DECISION.

Planning application 26/00745/OM

Please check the official Council application page for the current consultation deadline and application status.

WE WANT A STRONG CASE — NOT JUST A LOUD ONE.

This campaign opposes the proposed development, but we want the case against it to be accurate.

Residents are reviewing planning documents, historic records, professional reports and local evidence.

Where possible, important claims are checked against primary or official sources.

If something turns out to be wrong, we correct it.

VERIFIED

Checked against a primary, professional or official source.

LOCAL EVIDENCE

Photographs, videos or first-hand observations supplied by residents.

UNDER INVESTIGATION

A genuine question has been identified but further evidence or clarification is required.

WHAT DID THE 2020 GROUND REPORT SAY?

VERIFIED HISTORIC EVIDENCE

Residents have obtained and reviewed Hydrock's complete 2020 Phase 1 Ground Conditions Desk Study for Ashwicken Lakes.

Hydrock assessed the overall land-contamination risk for a redeveloped site as moderate, with some specific potentially high risks requiring confirmation through intrusive investigation, testing and assessment.

The report identified potential issues associated with former or reworked quarry ground and also identified geotechnical hazards including variable ground, shallow groundwater, running sands and slope instability.

Hydrock's field photographs recorded signs of collapse on part of the lake shoreline.

Most importantly, Hydrock stated that an appropriate intrusive investigation “will need to be undertaken”.

SO WAS THAT FOLLOW-UP INVESTIGATION DONE?

Residents have not yet independently identified the later investigation in publicly indexed planning material.

That does NOT prove it doesn't exist.

We believe the applicant and Council should be able to identify the subsequent report and demonstrate how Hydrock's recommendations have been addressed for the current proposal.

WE ARE NOT CLAIMING THE SITE IS CONTAMINATED.

Hydrock did not conclude that the site was legally “Contaminated Land”.

The question is whether the redevelopment risks identified by Hydrock were subsequently investigated and satisfactorily addressed.

LIVE HERE? YOUR LOCAL KNOWLEDGE MATTERS.

Planning reports don't always show what a place is like on a difficult day.

Useful local evidence may include dated photographs or videos showing:

  • school-time traffic
  • congestion
  • large vehicles using narrow roads
  • vehicles struggling to pass
  • diversion conditions
  • verge damage
  • pedestrian conditions
  • existing night-time darkness
  • relevant wildlife observations

Keep original files wherever possible and record the date and location.

LATEST FROM THE CAMPAIGN

25 AUGUST 2026

HYDROCK REPORT REVIEWED

Residents have obtained and reviewed the complete 2020 Hydrock Phase 1 Ground Conditions Desk Study. The report identified ground and redevelopment risks requiring further intrusive investigation. Residents are now seeking confirmation of where that subsequent work appears in the planning evidence.

OFFICIAL SOURCES

SHARE THIS PAGE

HAVE YOUR SAY
HAVE YOUR SAY